Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RC_rika

BWAHAHAHA!

Recommended Posts

I think I"ve said this b4, but I ordered "Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows" in April... just making sure I got my copy & everything! But I waited and waited, and never heard anything about it. Finally they sent me an email less than a month ago, saying the shipment was delayed.. I figured it's still a bit off b4 it comes out, so whatever. Well, the other day, the amount I paid for it, only $17.98 was taken out. I got another email saying that once the amount was taken out, they would begin shipment.... anyway, to make a long story short....

 

I GOT MY BOOK YESTERDAY!!!!!!!

 

HAHAHAHA!!!

 

 

3 days early, yay! Now, if only i could finish the 2 books b4 it, I could easily ruin the book for everyone!! @loll@ Buuuut, I"m not that mean. SO I won't. @lol@

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so what happens?.......do all those rumors of who dies true?

 

 

SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS

 

 

No, he doesnt die, he has kids with Weasly and Ron and Herimone have kids too. 19 yrs after the death of Voldemort they send thier kids to Hogwarts....

 

A bunch of other people die though..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in Walmart this morning and this one woman grabbed up the whole endcap of about 16 books then grabbed 3 Harry Potter board games

 

Now I bet she is going to put them on ebay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was in Walmart this morning and this one woman grabbed up the whole endcap of about 16 books then grabbed 3 Harry Potter board games

 

Now I bet she is going to put them on ebay

 

Whatta Dingbat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to say I thought I just saw a ton of the books in wm today...

 

 

 

I need to catch up on the movies let alone the books I Think the last one I saw was like #2 ... maybe #2.... Last thing I remember was some kind of spider thing & dragons & black coat things that kept going after poter & uhmm... some outlaw uncle of his or some such that disappeared with a dragon or something?.. :S

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SPOILERS, SPOILERS SPOILERS

 

Harry mostly died but then came back to life. Harry had to mostly die because he contained on of the horcureuxes peicesthat had to be destroyed in order to kill voldormort. Snape was double agent, and didnt betray dumbledore. Dumbledore was gonna die anyway from a curse, so they planed to have Snape kill him. Poor Doby the house elf died (The true hero of the books IMO). One-Eyed Mooney died, Snape died, the warewolf guy died and one of Ron's brothers died. Harry marries rons sister and have 3 kids, they name one after harrys father, one after his mother and one after snape. Ron and hermine get married and Drako gets married.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
who does Harry end up marrying?

who dies?

 

Ginny Weasley

 

The full list of deaths is on the wikipedia info:

 

Deathly Hallows on Wikipedia

 

EDIT - They took the death list off, so linked the cached version.

 

GAWD!!!! I knew this was going to happen on this forum!! It happened on the Batman begins spoiler. Can you put a spoiler next time since I wanted to buy the book first and not read some damn spoilers that wasn't marked as a spoiler!!! Thanks for ruin it for me!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

s

p

o

i

l

e

r

s

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I just got to the part where Dobby dies. He annoyed the crap out of me in Chamber of Secrets, but his death was kinda sad. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh, I still haven't finished book 5. I was going to read it while I was away, but there was too much to do on vacation, so I didn't have time!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
who does Harry end up marrying?

who dies?

 

Ginny Weasley

 

The full list of deaths is on the wikipedia info:

 

Deathly Hallows on Wikipedia

 

EDIT - They took the death list off, so linked the cached version.

 

GAWD!!!! I knew this was going to happen on this forum!! It happened on the Batman begins spoiler. Can you put a spoiler next time since I wanted to buy the book first and not read some damn spoilers that wasn't marked as a spoiler!!! Thanks for ruin it for me!!!!

 

I just now clicked on this thread because I needed to finish the book first. I was very conscious of spoilers, so I understand not wanting to get spoiled. My questions for you are - why would you click on any link with harry potter in the title? In order to see the spoiler, didn't you have to first scroll through the post asking the question before you got to the answer?

 

I'm all for putting "spoiler" in the thread title, but you also have to take reasonable precautions yourself.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was in Walmart this morning and this one woman grabbed up the whole endcap of about 16 books then grabbed 3 Harry Potter board games

 

Now I bet she is going to put them on ebay

 

Whatta Dingbat

 

Seriously, these were NOT hard to get. Great book though.

 

I was completely satisfied by the way things ended... I don't know that the epilogue was necessary but it was kind of cool I suppose. The ending was great, tied up all the loose ends and there were surprises, tragedies, and redemptions. I'm not a huge HP fan but I had chills the last few chapters. All in all, a great way to end what's surely going to be considered a classic fantasy series, right up there with LOTR. I think I'm going to grab the first four (never actually owned them) and read them all over again soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still haven't finished book 5 but now at least I finally got book 6. So whenever I find time to read it, I can go straight to 6, then 7.

 

 

Oh, & I found out that Scholastic is suing anyone that sent out Book 7 before it's release date. I hope they don't find/sue Deepdiscount.com, b/c that site is awesome!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Sponsors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gunn said something stupid and for once in the history of forever a d**k got what he had coming. End of story. Personal responsibility. Pass it on.
    • Since he was so sorry and apologetic about his tweets,  why not delete them? And this whole "I was being a provocateur" excuse is laughable. The reality is that the things he said we're so reprehensible and perverse there was no believable explanation he could offer,  so he just said he was joking... Yes, joking about serious issues does not immediately mean that the person is involved in them. I'll give you that,  but this wasn't just one tweet,  this was a whole series of horrible tweets, not one of which was funny in any way, all revolving around the same subject,  pedophilia. Which should raise a Red flag in most people's eyes. Often where there is smoke, there is fire. Especially in Hollywood. Have you ever heard of anyone by the name Weinstein, Spacey, or Singer? I agree that people can certainly change,  but why not go back and delete those tweets? The mere fact that Gunn left these up on twitter, suggests to me that he was never all that concerned or apologetic about their content. If I was to tweet something awful, get called out on it, and was truly apologetic, I would go out of my way to remove the offensive tweets. And while I know the GOTG cast has said he isn't the same person he was back then, let's not pretend that any of the cast actually know what Gunn does in his private life. My opinion on Dave Bautista is just that,  an opinion and I stand by it.
      Gunn is the one who really mishandled this situation. A public figure like Gunn should know his tweets will be held to a higher standard & yes these vile tweets will probably define him for some time, quite fairly in my opinion. However,  I don't think this sends a message to your average person,  that no matter how much they've changed as a person they'll always be defined by their lowest point, as they are simply regular people & not public figures like Gunn, the millionaire Hollywood director. The sheer volume & subject matter of Gunn's tweets were beyond awful & extremely disturbing. A public figure like Gunn should know better than to post these sort of things that would come come back to haunt him, & had he been sorry enough for tweeting about how much he enjoy's little boys touching his "naughty place", he would have deleted them, however here we are today & it feels like more than anything else,  he's sorry he got caught.
    • Gunn did explain the purpose behind those tweets, expressing that his intention those years ago was to act as a provocateur. He additionally had already apologized for his raunchy attempts at humor. I don't think that joking about serious issues in such a way necessarily means that a person has a thing for them, especially if the purpose of those "jokes" is to cause a reaction. It's making a joke which is offensive for the sake of it being offensive, and not necessarily to insinuate some kind of depraved fetish. There have been many news of idiot tourists making the Nazi salute in Germany, which doesn't automatically entail they're Nazis. They're just idiots (at the very least, hopefully). I believe this is a similar case with James Gunn.

      His tweets are disgusting, and don't say anything nice about the person he was in 2010. However, Gunn himself and the people he has closely worked with for over five years expressed that he has changed and that he's no longer the kind of person those tweets reflect. I don't think any kind of conclusion from this incident should be made without taking those people into account. And I don't think it's appropriate to assume Dave Bautista is depraved solely based on his stance from this situation. He knows much more about James Gunn than the slim portion most people get to see. Gunn's situation has been mishandled for the most part by people online, and shows a toxic mentality. It tells people that it doesn't matter how much they have changed as a person, their lowest point will always define them. And just in case there's any doubt, I don't mean to defend James Gunn's tweets, or the type of "humor" we waved like a flag back then. I don't even want to pretend to know what course of action Disney should've taken. It's a slippery slope, but there should be some balance between painting him as a misunderstood saint and a depraved would-be child-molester.
    • Pedophilia is not something that should EVER be joked about. It is a real problem worldwide and it is horrible. The tweets made by James Gunn were extremely insensitive and vile,  especially to victims and their families. Not one of these so called jokes were funny and they suggest that Mr. Gunn at the very least is a sick individual who could very well be involved in pedophilia in some form. He is simply not fit to direct anything until all of these "jokes" are adequately explained. I find it very sad & pathetic that so many people have defended Gunn and his disgusting tweets. It speaks volumes when thousands jump to the defense of a man who has endorsed pedophilia & may himself be a pedophile, simply because he directed a couple of entertaining movies. Here's to hoping that Disney will fire Dave Bautista too. He has been the most vocal of Gunn's supporters and I suspect has some disturbing skeletons in his closet as well.
    • I'll give you this, the figure is a perfect match for this wave. There are one or two winners, a killer BAF, and the rest are just... why?
×







Entertainment News International (ENI) is the popular culture network for fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE