Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Hawkeye101

does any know if hawkeye and nova are in ultimate alliance 2

Recommended Posts

isn't it supposed to be more secret wars based? hawkeye was in secret wars but not nova... not an answer, but just a little knowledge

 

Secret wars was tight!!

 

That would be cool if this game was like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Secret War not Secret Wars. Secret war is a comic book starring Nick Fury planning an unapproved mission on foreign soil which comes bite him a year later and that's why he goes underground which pretty much is beginning of everything from New avengers to Civil War story line. Now technically neither Hawkeye nor Nova were present for the Civl War storyline Hawkeye was dead and Nova was fighting the Annihilation wave but it will be pretty cool if they were still playable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

probably not. they might as well call the game "civil war" cause thats what that trailer looks like. hawk and nov wasnt in civil war so, maybe not. unless the 2nd half of the game goes through the secret invasion plot then we'll probably see both of'em but hawkeye as ronin. OR they might be skrulls and we cant use them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nova is in the game (it says on IMDB) but so far there has been no word on Hawkeye.

It is not known if Nova is playable or unplayable, but would be cool if he was playable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
they need to be in it but the way the it look you may have two rosters and not beable to have cap and ironman together :profx:

They are togetehr for 1 mission; the first one: the Secret War one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i was at the panel at nycc. they said it was based on civil war. since civil war sprang from secret war (not secret warS), then yes it is also therefore based on secret war. they didn't mention anything in regard to nova but they talked, only in passing, about hawkeye, but not implying one way or the other about him being in the game. they told us specifically not to ask questions about who would be in the game, but certain characters obviously were in it based on the trailer - captain america, spider-man, hulk, iron man, thor, storm, human torch, invisible woman, wolverine, thing, and maybe some others, i don't remember. nick fury and maria hill appear in the trailer too, but it seems they are NPC's. also, they said that except for a select few (apparently iron man, captain america, and spider-man), you could pretty much choose which side to be on, regardless of what happened in the comics (like if hawkeye/ronin was in the game, he wouldn't have to necessarily be anti-reg).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone else wishing there was MORE characters in this game?

 

I know theres a ton already and there will no doubt be DLC like in MUA1, i just hope theres like 4 or 5 DLC packs to go along with the game.

 

Ive played the 1st one so much im actually playing it again now getting myself ready for the sequal (i know there not linked).

 

Who would you all like to see in DLC packs?

 

id like:

 

X-force pack:

X-23

Warpath

Wolfsbane

Domino

 

Avengers pack:

Vision

Sacarlet witch

Hawkeye (if hes not in the original line up)

ms Marvel

 

Dark avengers pack:

Iron patriot

sentry

wolverine jnr

hawkeye/domino

 

Young avengers

etc etc

 

Some of the characters could be just reworks of characters they already have i.e iron man = iron patriot, just voice him different and give him a paint job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is in the footage they show on Gamestop TV, but then again a lot of ppl are shown fighting in it such as she-hulk, hawkeye, and nick fury. I hope he is, but I'd rather have Punisher over him and just get him as DLC eventually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that the whole lineup has been revealed...no Hawkeye.

 

He was available in 1 as DLC for the 360.

 

One of my favs to play as.

 

I was hoping everyone from 1 would be in 2 and that they would just add on to the roster, but it appears that's a no. Maybe UA3 will have everyone thus far and then some? That would rock to be able to play as 50+ characters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was hoping everyone from 1 would be in 2 and that they would just add on to the roster, but it appears that's a no. Maybe UA3 will have everyone thus far and then some? That would rock to be able to play as 50+ characters.

 

 

I was wanting the same thing man! Now I have to pray that Nightcrawler is available through DLC...again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Sponsors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, you don't know what you're talking about, "Pole."  Disney lets each division and studio operate with a huge amount of autonomy. Marvel Studios takes care of Marvel Studios business, including hiring and all that goes with it, like background checks. The autonomy they operate with was earned, but it's also given out of necessity; despite what people want to believe, Disney is just too damn busy with their own operations to micro-manage Marvel Studios, Pixar and Lucasfilm. To suggest they all knew about the tweets years ago is pure ignorant speculation. Marvel Studios may have, but Disney didn't. The real reason for the firing is a simple one: Disney's core value, the ideal everything revolves around and something ingrained into their corporate culture, is that childhood is sacred, special and magical. If there is one line you definitely can't cross with them, it's that. Disney couldn't care less about the conservo-twats who dug the tweets up or what supposed pressure they brought to bear. The truth is, Disney would've fired Gunn once they became aware of the tweets, regardless of the way they were discovered/brought to their attention. As I said, those tweets crossed an uncrossable line with Disney. You're apparently also ignorant of Disney's history of cutting ties with profitable people who exhibit unsavory character flaws. For example, once accusations came to light and an investigation was made, they fired John Lasseter--Pixar guru and animation genius who turned Disney animation around--because he had become an abusive drunk. That's a huge loss for Disney there. You just know Dreamworks or Illumination would love to snap him up asap. Or maybe you didn't know that they forced the Weinsteins out of Miramax and then sold it off completely because they heard about Harvey W's atrocious reputation, but couldn't find anyone to step forward and press charges. They believed what they heard though, and cut ties rather than associate with a horrible person, no matter how much money he brought in. Also, Gunn was an unknown when he was hired BY MARVEL STUDIOS (and not Disney). It was actually a huge gamble to hire him as the director of a big budget flick about an obscure group of comic characters the general movie-going public knew nothing of, let alone cared about. He hadn't done anything to suggest he was capable of helming such a project. He wasn't sought after. He wasn't admired or in demand. To assert Disney knew beforehand and turned a blind eye because of the money he'd bring in is just astoundingly stupid, lacking in both facts and common sense, and full of shat.
    • Don't care about the game. Not going to buy a PS4 for one game. Prefer my 1X for gaming. It looks like the Devs did a nice job. Folks should have a good time.   I do have a pre order in for the Legends figure based on game though.
    • PM sent if you’re still looking for the boxcar.
    • Went to three Walgreens after work.  The newest legends any of them had were from the first Deadpool wave.  
    • The unmasked head is definitely the best feature of this figure.  I saw some other reviews and people got better painted ones so I guess you were no so lucky. The hair to the side puts some dramatic effect but limits a bit which poses you can put the figure on.  But what really bothers me and I think all are like this, is the huge gap in the crotch area. Tha is very ugly. Psylocke has that problem too, but this figure looks a lot worse. I think that they should not use legs so skinny because that would make it easier to hide or just fix the peg and sue a shorter one.  In comparison I think the X-Force version looks better and the fact you can put the unmasked head on it is a plus. 
×







Entertainment News International (ENI) is the popular culture network for fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE