Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/10/2023 at 1:42 PM, WalterNewell58 said:

This should have been Wolverine sized, with an extra head of Logan. Wolverine stole his costume and wore it for a while, in case no one remembers.

I thought that too, but I bet any money they will release a Wolverine in the Fang outfit sometime in the future thus why they didn't include any wolvie parts or make this on the Wolvie buck.

I'm just stoked to have a Fang figure, it's one of my lesser favs of the wave, but he's a cool looking character to me, and they did this fair enough.

Posted
On 5/10/2023 at 1:42 PM, WalterNewell58 said:

This should have been Wolverine sized, with an extra head of Logan. Wolverine stole his costume and wore it for a while, in case no one remembers.

So is the difference in heights / body type an error on Hasbro's part? Should Fang be on a Wolverine body so swapping costumes would make sense?

I'm not in the scale police so often characters on the wrong molds don't bug me, just curious how they measured up in the comics you are referring to

Posted

When this was first announced. I said that Hasbro would be doing their first 616 X-Men wave without Logan. Somebody said that Fang was going to be Logan. I was right! This is the Imperial Guard Fang. Not Wolverine.

Posted
On 5/11/2023 at 1:35 AM, Hogun said:

When this was first announced. I said that Hasbro would be doing their first 616 X-Men wave without Logan. Somebody said that Fang was going to be Logan. I was right! This is the Imperial Guard Fang. Not Wolverine.

No. What most people were saying is that this would come with a Wolverine head as well as Fang. They never said it was Wolverine, just that it could be turned into Wolverine. It didn't happen though.

Posted
On 5/10/2023 at 2:02 PM, Itsybitsyspider said:

I'm glad they didn't, I have enough wolverines, I'm glad they gave us a new character. 

It still would’ve been Fang if on the Wolverine buck — just adding an alternate Logan head and claw hands. Or vice versa.

Posted
On 5/10/2023 at 8:32 PM, McHogan said:

So is the difference in heights / body type an error on Hasbro's part? Should Fang be on a Wolverine body so swapping costumes would make sense?

I'm not in the scale police so often characters on the wrong molds don't bug me, just curious how they measured up in the comics you are referring to

There have been different Fangs given they keep dying and being replaced, but they one who Logan stole the costume from was only an inch taller than Logan, so putting Fang on the Wolverine body would have been okay 

Posted

I would say, the point is they should have made Fang at a 5'4" height. That way you could just put one of many extra Wolverine heads and hands, we all should have by now, on him for the classic Fang Wolverine from the Dark Phoenix saga. While Fang is variable, they all check in pretty short. And now we are gonna get a Fang and the inevitable Fang Wolverine instead of just displaying this guy in two different ways or buying two if you really want both at once. I have always liked this guy, and will be getting him. Hopefully on clearance though. More Imperial Guards!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...







Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!


Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE